Conservation Reserve Program in Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 55,900
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Texas totaled $3,656,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joe Patrick Turner | Austin, TX 78749 | $1,175,201 |
82 | Geneva Logan Sumrow | Seminole, TX 79360 | $1,171,373 |
83 | Perkins Ranch Properties Ltd | Weatherford, TX 76086 | $1,166,742 |
84 | Trulock & Sons | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,160,349 |
85 | U-bar Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $1,159,771 |
86 | W T Simpson | Sudan, TX 79371 | $1,159,214 |
87 | Rex Cash | Post, TX 79356 | $1,158,382 |
88 | Glynn Price Estate | Levelland, TX 79336 | $1,157,865 |
89 | Richard Hunter | Dimmitt, TX 79027 | $1,157,147 |
90 | Jerry Young | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $1,156,423 |
91 | Al W Duesterhaus | Shallowater, TX 79363 | $1,154,209 |
92 | Neale Roy | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $1,153,079 |
93 | Ne-sha Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,151,106 |
94 | Raymond E Barrett | Pampa, TX 79065 | $1,147,200 |
95 | Delmon A Ellison Sr Estate | Seagraves, TX 79360 | $1,144,782 |
96 | Ray Don Caldwell | Tell, TX 79259 | $1,141,251 |
97 | James Silhan | Pep, TX 79353 | $1,135,587 |
98 | Nor-cas Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,135,257 |
99 | Doshier Land & Cattle Co | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $1,133,726 |
100 | June Barkley | Gruver, TX 79040 | $1,129,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”