Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 36,033
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Texas totaled $148,016,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Harvest Moon Farms Jv | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $60,767 |
102 | B & B Farms Ptn | Progreso, TX 78579 | $60,428 |
103 | Lenhart Bros | Tivoli, TX 77990 | $60,231 |
104 | S & S Farms Partnership | Robstown, TX 78380 | $60,195 |
105 | Byars Partnership | Vernon, TX 76384 | $60,124 |
106 | High Cotton Farms | Rowena, TX 76875 | $59,915 |
107 | T & S Askew Farms | Tahoka, TX 79373 | $59,744 |
108 | Adams Brothers | Odem, TX 78370 | $59,702 |
109 | Brad & Sarah Bickham Farms | Odem, TX 78370 | $59,635 |
110 | Furlow Farms | Odonnell, TX 79351 | $59,191 |
111 | Barry And Diane Altman Jv | Lubbock, TX 79407 | $59,179 |
112 | Mark & Kelly Mccormick Joint Venture | Floydada, TX 79235 | $58,892 |
113 | Double Z Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $57,891 |
114 | High Cotton Farms Jv | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $57,754 |
115 | Shannon & Lana Shaw | Lubbock, TX 79407 | $57,405 |
116 | Donald & Cinde Ebeling Jv | Plainview, TX 79072 | $57,014 |
117 | Wallace Farms Ptnshp | Ralls, TX 79357 | $56,971 |
118 | H K Ranch II | Mission, TX 78572 | $56,914 |
119 | Miller Brother Joint Venture | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $56,899 |
120 | Las Dos Palmas Farms Partnership | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $56,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”