Emergency Conservation Program in Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 9,181
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Texas totaled $86,740,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stumberg Ranch Partners Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78212 | $117,808 |
102 | Royal T Foster Jr | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $117,755 |
103 | James E Moores Simmons | Clarendon, TX 79226 | $116,858 |
104 | Frank And Sims Price Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $116,100 |
105 | Michael C Ely | Franklin, TX 77856 | $113,044 |
106 | G R Chapman Ltd Part | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $112,813 |
107 | William Hext III | Canadian, TX 79014 | $112,044 |
108 | Leslie R Darsey | Mclean, TX 79057 | $111,188 |
109 | Kathleen Jeffcoat | Nome, TX 77629 | $110,841 |
110 | Estate Of Brien O'connor Dunn | Bayside, TX 78340 | $110,568 |
111 | Coulon W Devillier | Winnie, TX 77665 | $109,622 |
112 | Randal & Julie Gates Joint Venture | Clarendon, TX 79226 | $109,584 |
113 | C B Christie Jr | Wichita Falls, TX 76308 | $109,453 |
114 | Martin Oconnor Cattle Co Inc | Victoria, TX 77902 | $108,788 |
115 | Harry Sims | Mobeetie, TX 79061 | $107,319 |
116 | Wayne C Freeman | Beaumont, TX 77705 | $105,905 |
117 | J K Equipment Corp | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $105,290 |
118 | Kiker Farm | Beaumont, TX 77707 | $104,829 |
119 | A R Eppenauer III | Marfa, TX 79843 | $104,734 |
120 | Rebecca A Harris | Saint Jo, TX 76265 | $103,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”