CCC Organic Programs in Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 191
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Texas totaled $358,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottag | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $35,250 |
2 | Vitamin Cottage Natural Foods Markets , Inc | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $25,250 |
3 | Yaupon Holly Tea LLC | Cat Spring, TX 78933 | $9,002 |
4 | Brookshire Brothers | Lufkin, TX 75902 | $7,532 |
5 | Wm Mark And Jane Wied Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,500 |
6 | Danklefs Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,500 |
7 | Leon J Schneider Farms | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,500 |
8 | R & W Leopold Farms | Columbus, TX 78934 | $4,500 |
9 | Charles M Blanchard Jr Dba C.m. Blanchard Co. | Beaumont, TX 77713 | $4,500 |
10 | Jeffery J Dugie | Nada, TX 77460 | $4,500 |
11 | William A Hefner Iv | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,500 |
12 | Robert Abell Farms Jv | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,500 |
13 | Texas Best Organics Inc | China, TX 77613 | $4,467 |
14 | Kenneth & Renee Staff Jv | Nada, TX 77460 | $4,269 |
15 | Rudy & Carol Drlik Joint Venture | Garwood, TX 77442 | $4,010 |
16 | Gabriel Valley Farms, LLC | Georgetown, TX 78026 | $3,758 |
17 | Aaron Vogler | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $3,755 |
18 | Engstrom Bros | Garwood, TX 77442 | $3,750 |
19 | Gary & Marla Cranek J/v | Garwood, TX 77442 | $3,750 |
20 | Henk Postmus | Dublin, TX 76446 | $3,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>