Total Commodity Programs in Atascosa County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,150
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Atascosa County, Texas totaled $63,993,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ridgway Farms Inc | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $377,032 |
42 | Rancho 1333 Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78259 | $375,376 |
43 | Lloyd House | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $372,087 |
44 | Richard L Porter | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $370,743 |
45 | Ryan Warnken | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $366,509 |
46 | Clif A Royal | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $365,443 |
47 | Hurd Ranch Company Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $362,551 |
48 | Glenn H Gembler | Mccoy, TX 78113 | $361,098 |
49 | Moore Farms | Pleasanton, TX 78064 | $348,674 |
50 | Baldemar Trevino Jr | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $334,876 |
51 | Floyd B Neuman And Dorothy L Neuman Revocable Livi | Austin, TX 78750 | $331,686 |
52 | F Wayne Neuman | Devine, TX 78016 | $319,836 |
53 | Wier Ranch | Charlotte, TX 78011 | $317,148 |
54 | Kent Carl Schwartz | Jourdanton, TX 78026 | $310,695 |
55 | Randy Wayne Mangum | Poteet, TX 78065 | $304,268 |
56 | Mark A Jacob | San Antonio, TX 78254 | $288,780 |
57 | K L M | San Antonio, TX 78264 | $288,506 |
58 | Shearrer Feedlot Inc | Poteet, TX 78065 | $284,168 |
59 | Peanut Properties Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78212 | $275,625 |
60 | Lonnie Rakowitz | Poteet, TX 78065 | $273,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”