Farm Subsidy information
Bailey County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Bailey County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 563
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bailey County, Texas totaled $33,168,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | F & S Pool Farms Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $166,529 |
22 | Double W Farms Inc | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $165,416 |
23 | Christopher Ryan Kindle | Maple, TX 79344 | $165,324 |
24 | Jim Pat & Suzie Claunch | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $158,532 |
25 | Ten Land Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $158,527 |
26 | Gore Farm Partnership | Sudan, TX 79371 | $153,287 |
27 | Fairview Gin Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $150,683 |
28 | Stonegate Farms Family Limited Partnership | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $141,349 |
29 | Pool Farms Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $136,789 |
30 | Jordan Pool Farms Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $136,094 |
31 | Jason & Shandi Williams Joint Venture | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $135,861 |
32 | Saylor Investments Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $133,324 |
33 | Ru-jo Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $118,295 |
34 | Rex Black | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $116,610 |
35 | James L Wedel | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $115,460 |
36 | J & S Dairies LLC | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $114,560 |
37 | Kemarc Inc | Littlefield, TX 79339 | $111,834 |
38 | , | $111,600 | |
39 | Ever Saul Juarez | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $106,596 |
40 | Cotter Ranch Ltd | Slaton, TX 79364 | $103,026 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”