Farm Subsidy information
Bailey County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Bailey County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 563
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bailey County, Texas totaled $33,168,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sharon Paulette Brinkerhoff | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $52,727 |
82 | Nick Bamert | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $52,516 |
83 | Pe-ru Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $52,167 |
84 | Bailco Farms Inc | Farwell, TX 79325 | $51,743 |
85 | Belinda Lanell Caswell | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $51,619 |
86 | Brandon Dewbre | Rogers, NM 88132 | $51,564 |
87 | Terry & Druscilla Hutton Farms Joint Venture | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $51,145 |
88 | John Ryan L Saylor | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $50,072 |
89 | Triple K Farm Partnership | Sudan, TX 79371 | $50,006 |
90 | , | $50,000 | |
91 | Latham & Mcknight Ltd | Fort Worth, TX 76132 | $49,897 |
92 | Jimni Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $49,816 |
93 | Chris & Allison Young Jv | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $49,754 |
94 | Allen Leon Brinkerhoff | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $49,675 |
95 | William Corley Hutton | Leander, TX 78641 | $49,607 |
96 | Jerry Nichols | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $49,039 |
97 | Mitchell Shawn Nichols | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $48,447 |
98 | Pete Caswell | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $48,332 |
99 | Sam Damron | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $47,922 |
100 | Tiller & Son Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $47,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”