Farm Subsidy information
Bailey County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Bailey County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,058
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bailey County, Texas totaled $509,141,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J & S Dairies LLC | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $3,566,332 |
2 | Caswell Cattle Co | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $3,347,933 |
3 | Richard And Stacey G Carter Farms | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $3,008,299 |
4 | Layton Sons Farms | Morton, TX 79346 | $2,729,973 |
5 | Don M Lowe | Maple, TX 79344 | $2,462,949 |
6 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,406,747 |
7 | Dutch Road Dairy LLC | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,224,651 |
8 | Jim Pat & Suzie Claunch | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,141,444 |
9 | W T Hutton | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $2,128,438 |
10 | Hall Brothers Partnership | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,087,461 |
11 | Pete Caswell | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,077,197 |
12 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $2,003,173 |
13 | Clay Birdwell | Hereford, TX 79045 | $1,997,855 |
14 | Ne-sha Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,982,044 |
15 | Armendariz Farms Jv | Sudan, TX 79371 | $1,915,067 |
16 | Jim Pat Claunch | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,891,458 |
17 | J Ob Farming Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $1,881,834 |
18 | John R Young | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,880,504 |
19 | Grassland Farms, LLC | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $1,877,223 |
20 | C W & Tim Meeks Partnership | Friona, TX 79035 | $1,875,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>