Farm Subsidy information
Bailey County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Bailey County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 810
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bailey County, Texas totaled $26,242,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chad King | Sudan, TX 79371 | $121,612 |
22 | Don M Lowe | Maple, TX 79344 | $120,446 |
23 | Terry & Druscilla Hutton Farms Joint Venture | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $114,627 |
24 | First Agri Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $112,861 |
25 | Cotter Ranch Ltd | Slaton, TX 79364 | $106,963 |
26 | Joni Harris | Levelland, TX 79336 | $100,000 |
27 | White Tx Land & Cattle Co LLC | Lubbock, TX 79407 | $95,169 |
28 | M & M Pool Farms Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $91,634 |
29 | Rusty Buckets Farms LLC Ronnie Altman Sole Mbr | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $91,323 |
30 | Tommy Gene Clark | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $90,342 |
31 | Hall Brothers Partnership | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $90,312 |
32 | Terry Sowder | Sudan, TX 79371 | $89,119 |
33 | Eric Glenn Sowder | Sudan, TX 79371 | $87,354 |
34 | T & B Financial Services Inc | Sudan, TX 79371 | $86,696 |
35 | Kemarc Inc | Littlefield, TX 79339 | $86,167 |
36 | W Jim & Tarah A Young Jv | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $85,554 |
37 | Pool Farms Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $80,523 |
38 | Mitchell Shawn Nichols | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $79,312 |
39 | Lazy Four Farms Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $76,044 |
40 | Saylor Investments Inc | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $75,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”