Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 166
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $9,397,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leslie Irene Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $12,667 |
42 | Theodore Wayne Kallus | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $11,979 |
43 | Robert Guthrie | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $11,894 |
44 | Ronnie Henke | El Campo, TX 77437 | $10,320 |
45 | Joseph A Matson | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $9,546 |
46 | Ross Russell | El Campo, TX 77437 | $9,434 |
47 | Mike Pfeifer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $9,146 |
48 | James Michael Brown Jr | Port O Connor, TX 77982 | $8,959 |
49 | Dale Garner Farms LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $8,030 |
50 | Judy Scott | San Antonio, TX 78230 | $7,616 |
51 | G David Westfall Family Ltd Ptnsh | Fredericksburg, TX 78624 | $7,576 |
52 | Stanley P Lester | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $7,576 |
53 | Margie Skeele | Houston, TX 77042 | $7,395 |
54 | Richard And Linda Williams Family Investments Ltd | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $7,290 |
55 | Michael J Balajka | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,953 |
56 | Alamo Beach Limited Partnership | Robstown, TX 78380 | $6,809 |
57 | Steven Dierschke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,129 |
58 | Harold L Evans | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,077 |
59 | William Billings | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,067 |
60 | Heather Nicole Marburger | Victoria, TX 77904 | $5,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”