Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Calhoun County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 167
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $434,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard E Whatley | Long Mott, TX 77979 | $7,263 |
22 | Michael Mutchler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,470 |
23 | H C Wehmeyer Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $6,258 |
24 | Harold Dan May Farm Trust | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $5,370 |
25 | James A Daniel | Tivoli, TX 77990 | $4,734 |
26 | Joseph A Matson | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $4,469 |
27 | Samuel E Nunley | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $4,256 |
28 | Andrew James Hahn Family Trust | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $3,979 |
29 | Pl Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $3,916 |
30 | Jason Wayne Svetlik | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $3,824 |
31 | Wayne Wehmeyer Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $3,711 |
32 | Grand Tejas Land LLC | Houston, TX 77006 | $3,710 |
33 | Toby Stary | Inez, TX 77968 | $3,229 |
34 | James R Dunn | Southlake, TX 76092 | $3,218 |
35 | 5k Family Partnership Lp | Victoria, TX 77904 | $3,216 |
36 | Larry W Stary | Inez, TX 77968 | $3,084 |
37 | Mark Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,966 |
38 | Gail Wehmeyer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,916 |
39 | Donald K Wehmeyer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,785 |
40 | Jean F Wehmeyer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”