Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Texas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 247
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $10,273,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Melvin Howard Neill Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $112,561 |
22 | Nunley Brothers | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $112,462 |
23 | Audra Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $108,620 |
24 | Rodney Shane May | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $106,110 |
25 | Brett Farms, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $101,132 |
26 | First State Bank ** | Louise, TX 77455 | $100,462 |
27 | Artie E Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $98,331 |
28 | Leslie Irene Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $91,563 |
29 | Brett Farms, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $82,275 |
30 | Ronnie Stiegler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $81,848 |
31 | Richard E Whatley | Long Mott, TX 77979 | $79,157 |
32 | Jacob A Startz | Cuero, TX 77954 | $78,627 |
33 | Thomas Mutchler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $74,249 |
34 | Andrew James Hahn Family Trust | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $64,560 |
35 | Whitaker Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $60,911 |
36 | Powderhorn Land & Cattle LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $59,185 |
37 | Louis & Shirley Foester III Family Trust | Victoria, TX 77904 | $55,285 |
38 | Klh Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $55,071 |
39 | Pl Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $48,677 |
40 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $46,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”