Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,125
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $193,174,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | R&g Fish, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $15,243,471 |
2 | St Martin Aquaculture Inc | Palacios, TX 77465 | $3,121,907 |
3 | B & B Joint Venture | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,936,352 |
4 | , | $2,327,566 | |
5 | Nunley Brothers | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,214,914 |
6 | Albert L Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $2,149,215 |
7 | Kenneth Jerome Hahn | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,793,826 |
8 | James F Hayes | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,751,259 |
9 | Williams Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,720,209 |
10 | Tony Wayne Daniel | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,714,611 |
11 | Michael Mutchler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,602,909 |
12 | Artie E Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,601,971 |
13 | Audra Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,560,698 |
14 | Mike Hahn Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,474,264 |
15 | Leslie Irene Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,460,999 |
16 | Pl Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,405,080 |
17 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $1,355,873 |
18 | Moehle Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,344,970 |
19 | J & L Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,342,864 |
20 | Louis Wayne Neill | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $1,288,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>