Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 236
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $18,006,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Stacy S Nichols | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $21,586 |
42 | Heather Nicole Marburger | Victoria, TX 77904 | $20,694 |
43 | Melvin Howard Neill Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $18,687 |
44 | Dale Garner Farms LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $18,297 |
45 | Bob B Gayle | Goliad, TX 77963 | $17,167 |
46 | Richard E Whatley | Long Mott, TX 77979 | $16,384 |
47 | Theodore Wayne Kallus | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $14,834 |
48 | M S Henke Family Limited Partnership | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $14,753 |
49 | Joe Shillings | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $14,641 |
50 | Trey Keaton Welch | Victoria, TX 77904 | $14,061 |
51 | Louis & Shirley Foester III Family Trust | Victoria, TX 77904 | $13,390 |
52 | Ronnie Henke | El Campo, TX 77437 | $13,343 |
53 | James Michael Brown Jr | Port O Connor, TX 77982 | $12,512 |
54 | Leslie Philip Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $12,464 |
55 | W H Bauer Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $12,441 |
56 | Joseph A Matson | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $12,386 |
57 | Robert Ryan Gossett | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $11,904 |
58 | Jerry A Irvin | Bloomington, TX 77951 | $11,843 |
59 | Mark Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $11,748 |
60 | Judy Scott | San Antonio, TX 78230 | $11,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”