Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 236
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $18,006,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R&g Fish, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $9,924,038 |
| 2 | St Martin Aquaculture Inc | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,316,177 |
| 3 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $290,990 |
| 4 | Williams Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $122,347 |
| 5 | Audra Henke | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $80,743 |
| 6 | Michael Mutchler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $70,927 |
| 7 | D & D Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $70,460 |
| 8 | Tony Wayne Daniel | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $63,890 |
| 9 | Charles White | Bloomington, TX 77951 | $60,966 |
| 10 | Glenna M White | Bloomington, TX 77951 | $60,942 |
| 11 | Powderhorn Land & Cattle LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $60,818 |
| 12 | Moehle Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $59,797 |
| 13 | Mike Hahn Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $52,425 |
| 14 | Casey Daniel | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $48,911 |
| 15 | Kw Farming LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $45,136 |
| 16 | Neill Farms LLC | Victoria, TX 77903 | $44,651 |
| 17 | Brett Farms, LLC | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $43,696 |
| 18 | Pl Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $42,548 |
| 19 | First State Bank ** | Louise, TX 77455 | $42,295 |
| 20 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $41,207 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf