Counter Cyclical Program in Calhoun County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 444
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $11,408,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nunley Brothers | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $371,572 |
2 | C & J Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $363,861 |
3 | Kenneth Jerome Hahn | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $338,867 |
4 | Albert L Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $327,270 |
5 | Harold D May | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $297,058 |
6 | Mike Hahn Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $294,952 |
7 | Williams Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $274,720 |
8 | T Daniel Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $257,254 |
9 | Williams Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $241,891 |
10 | Wesley Hobizal | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $232,157 |
11 | James F Hayes | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $225,985 |
12 | Padre Farms Inc | Corpus Christi, TX 78468 | $219,359 |
13 | Richard E Whatley | Long Mott, TX 77979 | $204,183 |
14 | Louis Wayne Neill | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $201,240 |
15 | Shannon Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $198,644 |
16 | Mark And Teresa Malaer Joint Ve | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $194,473 |
17 | Hahn Farms Joint Venture | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $187,512 |
18 | Walter Alton Hahn | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $179,201 |
19 | Joseph A Matson | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $174,694 |
20 | Rodney Shane May | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $174,556 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>