Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Cameron County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 112
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Cameron County, Texas totaled $2,564,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth M Benner | Frisco, TX 75035 | $5,856 |
42 | Pedro Alaniz | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $5,668 |
43 | Steve Lievens Farms LLC | La Feria, TX 78559 | $5,613 |
44 | Mid Valley Cattle Company LLC | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $5,610 |
45 | Jose Daniel Trevino | La Feria, TX 78559 | $5,595 |
46 | Minerva A Castillo | Brownsville, TX 78526 | $5,212 |
47 | Steve J Mauro Estate | San Antonio, TX 78269 | $5,062 |
48 | Marcus M Wick | San Benito, TX 78586 | $4,975 |
49 | Lawnpros Chem-green Inc | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $4,500 |
50 | Bobby G Hance | San Benito, TX 78586 | $4,476 |
51 | Randall P Crane | San Benito, TX 78586 | $4,404 |
52 | Christopher Casey Clipson | San Benito, TX 78586 | $4,372 |
53 | Chris Bauer | Rancho Viejo, TX 78575 | $4,226 |
54 | Procopio De La Garza | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $3,669 |
55 | Juan J Gracia | Lyford, TX 78569 | $3,637 |
56 | Roy D Castillo | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $3,617 |
57 | Carl Bauer Farms LLC | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $3,604 |
58 | Rafael Elizondo Reyna | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $3,425 |
59 | Eutimio Cantu | San Benito, TX 78586 | $3,364 |
60 | Michael E Leal | San Benito, TX 78586 | $3,261 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”