Counter Cyclical Program in Cameron County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,727
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cameron County, Texas totaled $47,403,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mathers Family Partnership Ltd | Brownsville, TX 78520 | $430,625 |
22 | Buena Vista Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $424,891 |
23 | San Miguel Partnership | Brownsville, TX 78520 | $419,059 |
24 | Rocking A Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $409,311 |
25 | Waters Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $399,732 |
26 | Waters Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $387,440 |
27 | Davis & Davis | Combes, TX 78535 | $371,998 |
28 | Bruce Gamble Farms | La Feria, TX 78559 | $364,724 |
29 | B J Simpson | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $362,591 |
30 | Edward F Bauer | La Feria, TX 78559 | $361,925 |
31 | G L Eubanks Farms | Santa Rosa, TX 78593 | $360,837 |
32 | R & F Farms Ptn | Brownsville, TX 78521 | $349,770 |
33 | Jerry Wheaton-hardin Ranch | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $348,342 |
34 | William & Sherilyn Goad Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $347,830 |
35 | Santa Monica Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $345,418 |
36 | Charick Farms | Santa Rosa, TX 78593 | $326,048 |
37 | Billie Mack Simpson | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $319,019 |
38 | Rio Hondo Implement Co Inc | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $314,023 |
39 | D & D Farms | La Feria, TX 78559 | $308,116 |
40 | John Scaief Farms LLC | San Benito, TX 78586 | $305,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”