Farm Subsidy information
Carson County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Carson County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,907
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carson County, Texas totaled $339,108,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Three D's | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $4,951,481 |
2 | Friemel Family Farms | Groom, TX 79039 | $4,493,300 |
3 | O'neal Shadid Ptn | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $3,636,703 |
4 | Friemel Brothers | Groom, TX 79039 | $3,064,613 |
5 | Mark Urbanczyk | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $2,402,425 |
6 | Simms & Son Inc | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $2,380,710 |
7 | Tony & Wamyth Britten J V | Groom, TX 79039 | $2,300,528 |
8 | Texas Tech University | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $2,300,303 |
9 | Happy State Bank ** | Dumas, TX 79029 | $2,282,836 |
10 | John G Weinheimer | Groom, TX 79039 | $1,916,219 |
11 | Dennis L Babcock | Groom, TX 79039 | $1,864,124 |
12 | Tracy W Kotara | White Deer, TX 79097 | $1,852,877 |
13 | Agrarian Management Inc | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $1,844,125 |
14 | Patrick Weinheimer Jr | Groom, TX 79039 | $1,630,063 |
15 | Blodgett Farms Inc | White Deer, TX 79097 | $1,621,675 |
16 | Fields Land & Cattle Ltd | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $1,605,546 |
17 | Dudley Pohnert | White Deer, TX 79097 | $1,599,183 |
18 | Hodges Stock Farm Inc | White Deer, TX 79097 | $1,588,956 |
19 | Gabel Bros Ptn | Panhandle, TX 79068 | $1,522,300 |
20 | Mcclellan Creek Fm Inc | Groom, TX 79039 | $1,504,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>