Farm Subsidy information
Coke County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Coke County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 767
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coke County, Texas totaled $35,004,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arledge Livestock Company LLC | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $1,241,537 |
2 | William M Simpson | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $953,368 |
3 | Waldon Millican | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $725,595 |
4 | Michael Drew Arrott | Bronte, TX 76933 | $706,257 |
5 | Frank And Sims Price Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $691,762 |
6 | Will E Simpson | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $537,865 |
7 | Lance Matthiesen Millican | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $509,341 |
8 | Lone Wolf Operations Unlimited LLC | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $505,296 |
9 | James Jones Livestock LLC | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $437,180 |
10 | Arnold Michalewicz | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $424,460 |
11 | Tommy Hickman | Bronte, TX 76933 | $375,143 |
12 | James T Sterling | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $362,479 |
13 | Kenneth C Fincher | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $338,465 |
14 | Mickey L Black | Lubbock, TX 79464 | $316,419 |
15 | C L Lee | Odessa, TX 79768 | $296,288 |
16 | Kelsy Millican | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $271,637 |
17 | Jim H Hughes | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $266,810 |
18 | Roger Strube | Wall, TX 76957 | $262,114 |
19 | Lee Ranch Cattle LLC | Odessa, TX 79762 | $261,983 |
20 | Copeland Land & Cattle LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $259,864 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>