Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Colorado County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 609
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Colorado County, Texas totaled $62,894,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & W Leopold Farms | Columbus, TX 78934 | $579,898 |
22 | James E Rees | Garwood, TX 77442 | $535,164 |
23 | 102 Rice LLC | Alleyton, TX 78935 | $513,660 |
24 | Colorado High Ranch Partnership | Sugar Land, TX 77496 | $505,893 |
25 | J P & Beverly Krenek | Garwood, TX 77442 | $505,689 |
26 | Jrj Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $492,918 |
27 | Larry & Donna Cranek J/v | Garwood, TX 77442 | $491,325 |
28 | R & R Farming | El Campo, TX 77437 | $471,256 |
29 | Roscoe Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $449,662 |
30 | Anderson Farming Company | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $445,420 |
31 | Gary & Marla Cranek J/v | Garwood, TX 77442 | $430,158 |
32 | Garwood Interests Lp | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $421,697 |
33 | Prosperity Bank ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $414,085 |
34 | Donald Leopold Farms | Nada, TX 77460 | $403,008 |
35 | William E Rees | Garwood, TX 77442 | $402,544 |
36 | Mighty Mite Inc | Austin, TX 78746 | $385,565 |
37 | Darrell & Renee Faas Farms | Wharton, TX 77488 | $383,138 |
38 | Lawrence Pavlu Jr Farms Joint Venture | Garwood, TX 77442 | $376,214 |
39 | Mark F Waligura | Garwood, TX 77442 | $371,496 |
40 | Cjj Partnership | Katy, TX 77494 | $362,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”