Production Flexibility Program in Comal County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 97
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Comal County, Texas totaled $427,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roy Elbel | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $5,543 |
22 | Clarence Timmermann | Buda, TX 78610 | $5,346 |
23 | Geneva M Grosser | Bulverde, TX 78163 | $5,044 |
24 | Kraft Family Partnership | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $4,690 |
25 | Terrell Timmermann | Austin, TX 78765 | $4,481 |
26 | Anita H Jaroszewski | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $3,905 |
27 | Roma N Rahe | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $3,784 |
28 | Noland F Koepp | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $3,714 |
29 | Johnny J Gass | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $3,589 |
30 | Dan Lee Bindseil | San Antonio, TX 78266 | $3,434 |
31 | Jerome Timmermann | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $3,334 |
32 | Chester J Grimm | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $3,320 |
33 | Lorenz F Bading | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $2,984 |
34 | Bbl Properties Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78266 | $2,878 |
35 | Lena E Timmermann | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $2,712 |
36 | Adeline Ploetz | Seguin, TX 78155 | $2,691 |
37 | Rocky Ray Dietert | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $2,192 |
38 | Vera Timmermann | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $2,143 |
39 | Ewald Luehlfing Deceased | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $2,118 |
40 | Elton Schwab | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $1,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”