Farm Subsidy information
Comal County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Comal County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 421
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Comal County, Texas totaled $5,697,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lorenz F Bading | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $19,838 |
42 | Lawrence E Schaefer | Seguin, TX 78155 | $18,077 |
43 | Paul G Silber Jr | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $17,908 |
44 | Wilburn W Jonas | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $17,835 |
45 | Clarence Timmermann | Buda, TX 78610 | $17,813 |
46 | Kreusler & Son | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $17,641 |
47 | Calvin Kraft | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $17,564 |
48 | Bbl Properties Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78266 | $17,078 |
49 | Johnny J Gass | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $16,004 |
50 | Terrell Timmermann | Austin, TX 78765 | $15,764 |
51 | Darrell Wayne Moeller | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $15,561 |
52 | Luther A Wilburn | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $14,832 |
53 | H W Holder | Blanco, TX 78606 | $14,825 |
54 | Cw Farm And Ranch | New Braunfels, TX 78132 | $14,752 |
55 | Hilmar Wehe | Spring Branch, TX 78070 | $14,750 |
56 | Craig Elbel | San Antonio, TX 78258 | $14,562 |
57 | Roman Lehmann | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $14,185 |
58 | Ralph Stapper | Fort Mc Kavett, TX 76841 | $13,084 |
59 | David Schlameus | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $12,437 |
60 | Raymond W Abel Decd | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $12,232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”