Conservation Reserve Program in Crosby County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 250
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Crosby County, Texas totaled $1,264,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J L Pipes & Reba Sue Pipes Irrevo | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $13,056 |
22 | Glenn E Jones | Spur, TX 79370 | $12,655 |
23 | Tommy Morrison | Lorenzo, TX 79343 | $12,643 |
24 | Kirk Mclaughlin Enterprises, Ltd | Lubbock, TX 79410 | $12,638 |
25 | Rg & Jan Havens Jv | Post, TX 79356 | $12,600 |
26 | Johnnie Hamilton Jr | Ransom Canyon, TX 79366 | $12,479 |
27 | Marshall Fam Tr | Leander, TX 78641 | $12,431 |
28 | Phillippe Farms LLC | Idalou, TX 79329 | $12,356 |
29 | Saddlehorn Investments Inc | Lubbock, TX 79411 | $12,159 |
30 | Kenneth Leatherwood | Vernon, TX 76384 | $11,895 |
31 | Parkhill Trust Dated January 6 2004 | Crosbyton, TX 79322 | $11,232 |
32 | Cherie Parkhill | Tyler, TX 75703 | $11,228 |
33 | Jan P Havens | Post, TX 79356 | $11,194 |
34 | W Chris Boyer | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $11,183 |
35 | Robin Lee Anderson Family Trust | Gun Barrel Cy, TX 75156 | $11,172 |
36 | Dee Moses | Crosbyton, TX 79322 | $11,006 |
37 | Melvin Dale Ratheal Estate | Tulsa, OK 74105 | $10,955 |
38 | George D Mcneill | Fort Collins, CO 80526 | $10,950 |
39 | S&p Ranch Family Limited Partnership | Lubbock, TX 79410 | $10,816 |
40 | Ana R Williamson | Dallas, TX 75219 | $10,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”