Total Conservation Programs in Dallam County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 132
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Dallam County, Texas totaled $1,820,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | B & E Moore Family Ltd | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $5,242 |
82 | Joe Beller | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $5,170 |
83 | Lucinda Haynes | Milwaukie, OR 97222 | $5,147 |
84 | Walter R Haynes | Milwaukie, OR 97222 | $5,147 |
85 | Stephen Clements | Pampa, TX 79066 | $5,092 |
86 | Parkerlene Pillans | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $4,458 |
87 | Lauren Lynsey Holmes | Edna, KS 67342 | $4,403 |
88 | Jeremy R Holmes | Edna, KS 67342 | $4,403 |
89 | Jon Dirk Rice | Mckinney, TX 75070 | $4,359 |
90 | Pamela Jo Vrla | Dallas, TX 75238 | $4,359 |
91 | H & H Farms | Texline, TX 79087 | $4,358 |
92 | 3kf Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $4,352 |
93 | Carl E French | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $4,349 |
94 | Jesse W James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $4,235 |
95 | Gayla J James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $4,235 |
96 | Joseph E Boren | Houston, TX 77094 | $3,732 |
97 | Kerry Carlisle | Abernathy, TX 79311 | $3,732 |
98 | Ronald J Howell | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $3,654 |
99 | Pillans Family Trust A | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $3,582 |
100 | Pillans Family Trust B | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $3,582 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”