Conservation Reserve Program in Deaf Smith County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,285
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Deaf Smith County, Texas totaled $162,255,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mrs N A Brown & Sons | Friona, TX 79035 | $2,485,230 |
2 | Bar 7 Cattle Co | Friona, TX 79035 | $2,432,918 |
3 | Hill Land & Cattle Co | Hart, TX 79043 | $2,258,529 |
4 | Bill Gruhlkey Farms | Wildorado, TX 79098 | $1,267,214 |
5 | Homfeld Farm & Ranch Ltd | Hereford, TX 79045 | $1,257,176 |
6 | Gene Bradley | Dimmitt, TX 79027 | $1,206,922 |
7 | Kenneth Walker Land & Cattle Co Inc | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $1,175,305 |
8 | Kenneth Walker | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $1,162,379 |
9 | Farris Land Partnership | Nazareth, TX 79063 | $1,134,688 |
10 | Tod Bradley | Dimmitt, TX 79027 | $1,114,720 |
11 | Joe Patrick Turner | Austin, TX 78749 | $1,078,934 |
12 | Richard & Dixie Fortenberry Farms | Vega, TX 79092 | $1,040,960 |
13 | Glenn D Simpson | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $1,024,784 |
14 | William C Simpson | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $1,024,780 |
15 | Coleman Land & Cattle | Ruidoso, NM 88345 | $1,010,650 |
16 | Zay Bradley Farms | Dimmitt, TX 79027 | $998,080 |
17 | Mark T Denson | Brenham, TX 77833 | $963,806 |
18 | J & J Gruhlkey Farms | Levelland, TX 79336 | $959,667 |
19 | Andrew Watley | Spearman, TX 79081 | $936,379 |
20 | Spear Cattle Co | Bushland, TX 79012 | $935,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>