Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Duval County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 183
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Duval County, Texas totaled $592,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Hinojosa Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $3,372 |
62 | Billy G Healer | Pasadena, TX 77502 | $3,367 |
63 | Manuel S Ramon Sr | Alice, TX 78332 | $3,212 |
64 | Samuel D Gavito | Benavides, TX 78341 | $3,188 |
65 | Jesus G Saenz | Benavides, TX 78341 | $3,136 |
66 | Armin Lopez | Corpus Christi, TX 78415 | $3,087 |
67 | Victor Laredo Jr | Freer, TX 78357 | $3,001 |
68 | Clemente Garcia Jr | San Diego, TX 78384 | $3,000 |
69 | Jorge A Garza Trust | San Antonio, TX 78299 | $2,975 |
70 | Richard Ortiz | Alice, TX 78332 | $2,909 |
71 | Willie Utley | Benavides, TX 78341 | $2,894 |
72 | Tomas Hernandez | San Antonio, TX 78201 | $2,849 |
73 | Roberto Tovar | San Diego, TX 78384 | $2,813 |
74 | Roel Saenz | San Diego, TX 78384 | $2,778 |
75 | Norberto S Guerra | Premont, TX 78375 | $2,760 |
76 | William E Foster | Kingsville, TX 78363 | $2,716 |
77 | George B Hamilton III | Bruni, TX 78344 | $2,700 |
78 | Raul M Garza | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $2,700 |
79 | Guadalupe R Garza | Corpus Christi, TX 78414 | $2,690 |
80 | Edmundo C Hinojosa | Benavides, TX 78341 | $2,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”