Farm Subsidy information
Duval County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Duval County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,625
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Duval County, Texas totaled $68,889,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hamilton Farms | Riviera, TX 78379 | $2,537,884 |
2 | Kennard W Moote | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $1,325,254 |
3 | Prukop Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $1,058,237 |
4 | Carl Hofstetter | Realitos, TX 78376 | $1,025,060 |
5 | Los Orcones Ranch Ltd | Benavides, TX 78341 | $798,418 |
6 | Atlee Martin Parr | Benavides, TX 78341 | $797,461 |
7 | W H R G | Calliham, TX 78007 | $785,398 |
8 | J & C Martin Family Lp | San Diego, TX 78384 | $696,297 |
9 | Harry V Cherry | Premont, TX 78375 | $604,501 |
10 | Schneider Bros | Premont, TX 78375 | $587,040 |
11 | Feral Farms | Realitos, TX 78376 | $578,761 |
12 | Roel Gonzales | Alice, TX 78332 | $554,657 |
13 | David Lee | Premont, TX 78375 | $515,152 |
14 | G Wise Family Limited Partnership | Mcallen, TX 78503 | $511,673 |
15 | James Laurence Sheerin Jr Trust | Mission, TX 78572 | $494,330 |
16 | Atlee W Parr | Benavides, TX 78341 | $490,065 |
17 | Andrea K Sheerin Trust | Mission, TX 78572 | $486,268 |
18 | Rafael Ricardo Ramirez | San Antonio, TX 78240 | $478,385 |
19 | Cline Children Class Trust | Rayne, LA 70578 | $425,320 |
20 | Atilano E Chapa | Kingsville, TX 78363 | $409,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>