Production Flexibility Program in Glasscock County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 478
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Glasscock County, Texas totaled $18,546,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tommy & Karla Hoelscher | Garden City, TX 79739 | $99,507 |
62 | Larry Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $96,366 |
63 | Pedro Trevino | Garden City, TX 79739 | $95,262 |
64 | Edwards Bros Ranch Co | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $94,984 |
65 | Gena Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $86,236 |
66 | Kenneth Cook | Stanton, TX 79782 | $84,941 |
67 | Doyle Schaefer Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $84,283 |
68 | Dennis Hoelscher Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $84,282 |
69 | Andrew & Loretta Schaefer Jv | Garden City, TX 79739 | $82,858 |
70 | Henry J Chudej | Garden City, TX 79739 | $81,284 |
71 | Tommy Edward Halfmann | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $77,850 |
72 | Neal Thomas Wilde | Garden City, TX 79739 | $77,011 |
73 | James Machicek | Garden City, TX 79739 | $76,905 |
74 | Jerline T Frysak | Garden City, TX 79739 | $75,494 |
75 | James Victor Cmerek | Midland, TX 79706 | $72,666 |
76 | Ingram Farms Inc | Midland, TX 79705 | $72,472 |
77 | Russell J Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $72,380 |
78 | Elvie Dean Holcomb | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $71,304 |
79 | Wayne Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $71,087 |
80 | Agri Cotton Inc | Midland, TX 79706 | $70,304 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”