Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Glasscock County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Glasscock County, Texas totaled $588,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jason Phillips | Stanton, TX 79782 | $12,870 |
22 | Paul & Tara Schwartz Fms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $10,101 |
23 | Carey Niehues Fms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $10,064 |
24 | Eugene E Hirt | Garden City, TX 79739 | $9,063 |
25 | S & S Wilson Farms Inc | Midland, TX 79706 | $8,729 |
26 | Agri Industries Inc | Midland, TX 79706 | $7,371 |
27 | Darrell Halfmann Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $6,732 |
28 | Randy Hoelscher Fms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $5,653 |
29 | Johnny Louder | Stanton, TX 79782 | $4,514 |
30 | David A Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $4,506 |
31 | Perry Farms | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $3,767 |
32 | Carla Brooks | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $3,765 |
33 | Ernest Braden | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $2,909 |
34 | Delbert R Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $2,764 |
35 | Wilbert Braden | Midland, TX 79706 | $2,714 |
36 | Deborah Murray | Pampa, TX 79065 | $2,654 |
37 | Marshall C Louder | Tarzan, TX 79783 | $2,577 |
38 | T & K Hoelscher Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $2,405 |
39 | Kelly Means | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $2,145 |
40 | G P Trey Harrell III | Stanton, TX 79782 | $2,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”