Production Flexibility Program in Glasscock County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 478
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Glasscock County, Texas totaled $18,546,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wendell R Halfmann Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $120,473 |
42 | Allen J Jansa | Garden City, TX 79739 | $120,277 |
43 | Kyle Cook | Stanton, TX 79782 | $118,183 |
44 | Larry Wheat | Garden City, TX 79739 | $117,650 |
45 | Wilson C Edwards Jr | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $116,654 |
46 | Wayne A Jansa | Garden City, TX 79739 | $115,823 |
47 | Douglas Joseph Schaefer | Garden City, TX 79739 | $115,820 |
48 | Jerry Currie Ranch Co | Garden City, TX 79739 | $115,227 |
49 | Mark Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $114,273 |
50 | David & Belinda Weishuhn | Garden City, TX 79739 | $113,642 |
51 | Chris Matschek | Garden City, TX 79739 | $112,318 |
52 | Doyle Schaefer | Garden City, TX 79739 | $111,620 |
53 | Eric Seidenberger | Garden City, TX 79739 | $108,831 |
54 | Perry Farms | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $107,555 |
55 | Gerald Hoelscher Fms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $106,972 |
56 | Nathan Halfmann | Garden City, TX 79739 | $105,401 |
57 | Paul B Schwartz | Garden City, TX 79739 | $105,353 |
58 | Johnny Louder | Stanton, TX 79782 | $105,034 |
59 | George E Schwartz | Garden City, TX 79739 | $102,938 |
60 | Michael Glenn Batla | Midland, TX 79706 | $102,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”