Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Guadalupe County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 435
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Guadalupe County, Texas totaled $3,785,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lloyd M Pape | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $9,900 |
62 | Floyd William Braune | Seguin, TX 78155 | $9,761 |
63 | Bryan Luensmann | Seguin, TX 78155 | $9,680 |
64 | Geronimo Grain & Packaging Inc | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $9,659 |
65 | Dusty Engelke | Kingsbury, TX 78638 | $9,515 |
66 | Pedro Humberto Schambon | Nixon, TX 78140 | $9,219 |
67 | Garland Powers Iv | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $8,965 |
68 | Garland Powers III | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $8,635 |
69 | Rex Schnitz | La Vernia, TX 78121 | $8,360 |
70 | Sylvia Kelso | Seguin, TX 78155 | $8,318 |
71 | Farrell Johnson | Kingston, OK 73439 | $7,889 |
72 | Howell Crane And Rigging Inc | San Antonio, TX 78220 | $7,535 |
73 | Gordon Land | Seguin, TX 78155 | $7,370 |
74 | Wayne F Hollub | Kingsbury, TX 78638 | $6,985 |
75 | Tombstone Land & Cattle Company Inc | Kingsbury, TX 78638 | $6,985 |
76 | Dennis Dreyer | Marion, TX 78124 | $6,895 |
77 | Stephen Germann | Seguin, TX 78155 | $6,875 |
78 | Charmaine Rachell Moore | Stockdale, TX 78160 | $6,765 |
79 | Kenneth W Pape | San Marcos, TX 78666 | $6,655 |
80 | Pleas D Anderson II | Seguin, TX 78155 | $6,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”