Loan Deficiency in Hartley County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 438
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hartley County, Texas totaled $36,583,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marilyn Carson | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $159,676 |
62 | Allen W Hicks | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $152,837 |
63 | Genesis Project | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $152,620 |
64 | Max Z Farms Gp | Hartley, TX 79044 | $150,000 |
65 | Karlyle Haaland | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $149,131 |
66 | Kevin Spielman Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $146,937 |
67 | G L Lasley Est Part | Fort Worth, TX 76132 | $144,166 |
68 | Howard E Lathem | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $144,074 |
69 | Gene Ensz | Hartley, TX 79044 | $143,054 |
70 | Melvin H Przilas | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $142,647 |
71 | Steve Beattie | Stratford, TX 79084 | $142,136 |
72 | Pat Hartman Farms Gp | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $141,469 |
73 | Storehouse | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $141,097 |
74 | Dyke Rogers | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $140,917 |
75 | Green Brothers | Hartley, TX 79044 | $139,387 |
76 | William And Virginia Inc | Kerrville, TX 78028 | $137,937 |
77 | Verle J Koehn | Princeton, ID 83857 | $136,323 |
78 | B C Farms Of South Carolina Inc | Aiken, SC 29803 | $134,656 |
79 | Cal Ja Cattle Co Inc | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $132,860 |
80 | Colquitt Farms | Amarillo, TX 79159 | $131,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”