Conservation Reserve Program in Hartley County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 541
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hartley County, Texas totaled $40,348,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | William J Graff | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $119,911 |
102 | Lico Partnership | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $119,853 |
103 | Sherri Bryant Cornett Tr | Amarillo, TX 79101 | $119,598 |
104 | Nancy Jean Cox | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $117,121 |
105 | Dwayne E & Mavis R Powell | Norman, OK 73069 | $114,662 |
106 | Mildred Wood | Justiceburg, TX 79330 | $112,783 |
107 | Jeff B Roberts | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $112,072 |
108 | Edna M Mitchell | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $110,412 |
109 | David W Beck Jr & Barry Beck Jone | Amarillo, TX 79120 | $109,515 |
110 | Tri State Pipeline Serv Inc | Ninnekah, OK 73067 | $108,648 |
111 | 14 Mile Ranch | Hilmar, CA 95324 | $108,370 |
112 | Doris Ann Conrad | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $106,893 |
113 | Melvin H Przilas | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $105,932 |
114 | Donald W Hutchison | Boise City, OK 73933 | $105,838 |
115 | V T Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $104,499 |
116 | Patricia A Gustin | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $103,440 |
117 | Gabe Ferris Farms Gp | Harrodsburg, KY 40330 | $102,261 |
118 | Kenneth L Powell Ranch Gp | Sequim, WA 98382 | $101,846 |
119 | F E Thomas Jr | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $101,134 |
120 | G Malcolm Bryant | Amarillo, TX 79119 | $99,899 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”