Counter Cyclical Program in Hopkins County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 64
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hopkins County, Texas totaled $189,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Casey Warren Durst | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $237 |
42 | Alan C Stubblefield | Sulphur Bluff, TX 75481 | $231 |
43 | Jerry H Stubblefield | Sulphur Springs, TX 75483 | $228 |
44 | Cecil R Franzina | Sulphur Bluff, TX 75481 | $218 |
45 | Brignon Cattle Co | Wolfe City, TX 75496 | $218 |
46 | Hubert C Vaughn And Jan E Vaughn | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $204 |
47 | Michael Vititow | Brashear, TX 75420 | $179 |
48 | Wayne Parker | Sulphur Springs, TX 75483 | $153 |
49 | Mary A Rawson | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $130 |
50 | Tommy Dickens Dairy | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $92 |
51 | William E Chamness | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $87 |
52 | Mary K Mccorkle | Sulphur Springs, TX 75483 | $81 |
53 | Evodio Martinez | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $72 |
54 | Bryant Fisher | Yantis, TX 75497 | $65 |
55 | Morgan Anderson | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $50 |
56 | Hla Inc | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $46 |
57 | W D Goggans | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $39 |
58 | Sandra K Turner | Point, TX 75472 | $35 |
59 | Martha D Hare | Sulphur Bluff, TX 75481 | $31 |
60 | Max Palmer | Sulphur Springs, TX 75482 | $22 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”