Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Hudspeth County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Hudspeth County, Texas totaled $743,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dorothy Ivey Strachan | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $9,994 |
22 | Daniel Ainsworth | Dell City, TX 79837 | $9,405 |
23 | Andres Bernal | El Paso, TX 79904 | $8,448 |
24 | Jose Luis Galvan | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $8,054 |
25 | Layton Sons Farms | Morton, TX 79346 | $6,435 |
26 | La Sierra Farms | Dell City, TX 79837 | $5,587 |
27 | Terry Douglas Rose Dba 4-roses Farms | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $4,326 |
28 | Double U Cattle Co. | El Paso, TX 79937 | $4,095 |
29 | Wanda Layton | Morton, TX 79346 | $3,676 |
30 | Norma Layton | Morton, TX 79346 | $3,676 |
31 | H D Hilley | El Paso, TX 79927 | $3,500 |
32 | Lorenzo Gallegos | Dell City, TX 79837 | $3,500 |
33 | Daisy Louise Hilley | El Paso, TX 79927 | $3,500 |
34 | Sidney W Cowan | Sierra Blanca, TX 79851 | $3,500 |
35 | Robert N Templeton | Las Cruces, NM 88011 | $3,500 |
36 | Rodolfo Perez | El Paso, TX 79935 | $2,179 |
37 | Rogelio Montoya Sr | Fabens, TX 79838 | $1,989 |
38 | Hudspeth County Line Farms Inc | Sierra Blanca, TX 79851 | $1,916 |
39 | Susan Engle Bean | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $1,750 |
40 | James Breckenridge Bean Jr | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $1,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”