Farm Subsidy information
Jeff Davis County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jeff Davis County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jeff Davis County, Texas totaled $24,370,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Means Ranch Co Ltd | Van Horn, TX 79855 | $1,569,030 |
2 | Kokernot 06 Ranch Inc | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $1,549,408 |
3 | Antelope Valley Ranch | Deming, NM 88030 | $1,031,017 |
4 | David Dean Sr. | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $738,258 |
5 | Rancho Espuela Cattle Co | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $695,771 |
6 | A R Eppenauer III | Marfa, TX 79843 | $646,350 |
7 | 3-d Cattle Company | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $642,299 |
8 | Miller Ranch | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $453,344 |
9 | Espy Family Ranches LLC | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $428,546 |
10 | Allen Kasparian | Deming, NM 88030 | $383,363 |
11 | Mcknight Ranch Co Lp | Odessa, TX 79768 | $369,321 |
12 | Southwest Land Associates Ltd | Beverly Hills, CA 90212 | $323,224 |
13 | Deron Kasparin | Valentine, TX 79854 | $322,314 |
14 | Los Medio Corporation | Corpus Christi, TX 78403 | $266,977 |
15 | John Luedecke | Alpine, TX 79831 | $264,885 |
16 | Ron Helm | Van Horn, TX 79855 | $209,021 |
17 | Gearhart Ranch Partners | Midland, TX 79702 | $177,307 |
18 | Hughes Cattle Co | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $163,362 |
19 | James F Dyer II | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $160,058 |
20 | Marfa Associates Ltd | Beverly Hills, CA 90212 | $151,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>