Farm Subsidy information
Jim Hogg County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jim Hogg County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 307
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jim Hogg County, Texas totaled $22,284,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Luis Eduardo Hinojosa | Austin, TX 78749 | $9,545 |
142 | John M Forbes | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $9,485 |
143 | Keith Joseph Pendleton | Wimberley, TX 78676 | $9,423 |
144 | Alonzo Rodriguez | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $8,879 |
145 | , | $8,727 | |
146 | , | $8,694 | |
147 | Hector E Ramirez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,630 |
148 | Juan L Escamilla Jr | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,620 |
149 | Noel O Vivanco | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,617 |
150 | Christopher W Garza | Guerra, TX 78360 | $8,520 |
151 | Rafael Gomez Jr | San Antonio, TX 78221 | $8,421 |
152 | Charlotte H Powell | San Antonio, TX 78259 | $8,275 |
153 | Roberto S Garcia Sr | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,267 |
154 | Jaime T Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $8,264 |
155 | Ynocencio A Avila | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,148 |
156 | Rafael De La Garza Est | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $7,974 |
157 | Israel Hinojosa | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $7,931 |
158 | Therese Crocker | Riviera, TX 78379 | $7,831 |
159 | Laurentina Vela | Laredo, TX 78040 | $7,682 |
160 | Rodolfo De Luna Jr | Laredo, TX 78041 | $7,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”