Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Jim Wells County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 269
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Jim Wells County, Texas totaled $4,625,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Knolle Dairy Farms Inc. | Sandia, TX 78383 | $43,710 |
22 | Sandia Agricultural Enterprises Inc | Sandia, TX 78383 | $42,076 |
23 | Mark E Fischer | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $40,953 |
24 | Gordon Klatt & Son | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $39,525 |
25 | Roy S Dennis | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $39,311 |
26 | Gafford Family Partnership | Alice, TX 78332 | $37,981 |
27 | Knolle Cattle Co | Sandia, TX 78383 | $36,592 |
28 | Frank B Engelking | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $35,934 |
29 | Renee R Mitchell | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $35,828 |
30 | 2g Hay & Cattle Co LLC | Sandia, TX 78383 | $35,552 |
31 | Alan Wheeler | Kingsville, TX 78363 | $35,166 |
32 | Richard C Siemonsma | Falfurrias, TX 78355 | $34,536 |
33 | James C Strause | George West, TX 78022 | $33,841 |
34 | Daniel Acevedo | Mission, TX 78572 | $32,763 |
35 | Thomas Dean Carriger | George West, TX 78022 | $32,311 |
36 | Nesloney Brothers Farms | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $31,733 |
37 | Rogelio Mercado | Alice, TX 78333 | $31,049 |
38 | Larry Busby | George West, TX 78022 | $30,436 |
39 | 7 H Cattle Inc | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $29,851 |
40 | Warren Kopplin | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $29,787 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”