Total Commodity Programs in Jim Wells County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,317
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Jim Wells County, Texas totaled $72,459,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gwosdz Three Farms | Sandia, TX 78383 | $4,230,762 |
2 | Prukop Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $3,926,167 |
3 | Schneider Bros | Premont, TX 78375 | $3,457,289 |
4 | Keith & Zak Adams | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $2,023,504 |
5 | Jerry H Nock | Alice, TX 78332 | $1,761,353 |
6 | Roy & Penny Pillack Jv | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $1,760,490 |
7 | David Hoelscher | Alice, TX 78332 | $1,539,720 |
8 | Gwosdz Brothers | Sandia, TX 78383 | $1,337,659 |
9 | Frank J Hoelscher Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $1,153,626 |
10 | Garry J Nock | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $1,004,685 |
11 | Nesloney Brothers Farms | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $984,112 |
12 | Edmund A Pawlik Inc | Alice, TX 78333 | $945,753 |
13 | Palo Hueco Farms Inc | Alice, TX 78332 | $929,464 |
14 | Richard & Pam Lowman Jv | Iola, TX 77861 | $928,132 |
15 | La Tierra Farms Inc | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $917,030 |
16 | Hamilton Farms | Riviera, TX 78379 | $850,782 |
17 | Natalie B Hoelscher | Alice, TX 78332 | $782,601 |
18 | Robert Driscoll And Julia Driscoll Foundation | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $758,995 |
19 | Skip Row Farms, LLC. | Alice, TX 78333 | $754,486 |
20 | Orange Grove Farms Inc | Fort Worth, TX 76101 | $717,904 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>