Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Karnes County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 119
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Karnes County, Texas totaled $656,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ellis E Lyons Jr | Barrington, IL 60010 | $5,089 |
42 | Larry Yosko | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $5,078 |
43 | Dennis William Schlinke | Nordheim, TX 78141 | $4,997 |
44 | Mary Pawelek | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $4,962 |
45 | Mike Burris | Victoria, TX 77903 | $4,946 |
46 | Jim P Natho | Runge, TX 78151 | $4,898 |
47 | Thomas A Natho | Runge, TX 78151 | $4,896 |
48 | Joyce P Kimble | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $4,729 |
49 | Harold Joe Bishop Jr | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $4,645 |
50 | Andy Rives | Hobson, TX 78117 | $4,269 |
51 | George A Pawelek | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $4,027 |
52 | Janysek Brothers | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $3,896 |
53 | Urrutia Brothers Farm Partnership | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $3,625 |
54 | Leonard Korzekwa | Falls City, TX 78113 | $3,541 |
55 | Manka Farm | College Station, TX 77845 | $3,539 |
56 | Patrick W Jarzombek | Falls City, TX 78113 | $3,186 |
57 | James Foegelle | Poteet, TX 78065 | $3,040 |
58 | Rowe D Caldwell Jr | Del Valle, TX 78617 | $3,003 |
59 | Thomas L Sisti | Victoria, TX 77904 | $2,939 |
60 | Burvick M Bailey | San Antonio, TX 78217 | $2,853 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”