Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Lamb County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 141
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Lamb County, Texas totaled $1,562,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Robert Struve | Olton, TX 79064 | $3,379 |
102 | Milton & M Hoyt Family Rev Tr | Payson, UT 84651 | $3,378 |
103 | Cecilio Ontiveros Jr | Springlake, TX 79082 | $3,284 |
104 | Debco Farms | Fieldton, TX 79326 | $3,281 |
105 | Bennie Harmon Estate | Amherst, TX 79312 | $3,251 |
106 | Alfred Allen | Olton, TX 79064 | $3,207 |
107 | Nancy J Baucum | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $3,183 |
108 | Arms Length Inc | Olton, TX 79064 | $3,149 |
109 | Raymon Carson | Olton, TX 79064 | $3,098 |
110 | Magoline James | Springlake, TX 79082 | $3,080 |
111 | Brandstatt Family Tr 2 | Amherst, TX 79312 | $3,078 |
112 | Barbara K Coker | Springlake, TX 79082 | $3,049 |
113 | Troy S Young | Olton, TX 79064 | $3,030 |
114 | Winhil Corp | Lubbock, TX 79416 | $2,924 |
115 | Ted Harrison | Muleshoe, TX 79347 | $2,720 |
116 | Bibby Farms Inc | Springlake, TX 79082 | $2,714 |
117 | Delvin Leon Walden | Springlake, TX 79082 | $2,667 |
118 | George Richardson Jr | Littlefield, TX 79339 | $2,457 |
119 | Kerwin Oliver | Littlefield, TX 79339 | $2,426 |
120 | Rab-3 Sisters Ltd Prtn | Weeping Water, NE 68463 | $2,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”