Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Live Oak County, Texas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 192
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Live Oak County, Texas totaled $373,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dana Floyd Wilson | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $1,308 |
82 | Harlyn Goebel | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $1,274 |
83 | Monty Lyne | George West, TX 78022 | $1,270 |
84 | Dorothy L Rippstein | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $1,245 |
85 | Billy Wieding | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $1,244 |
86 | Len Custer | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $1,190 |
87 | Thomas Dean Carriger | George West, TX 78022 | $1,184 |
88 | , | $1,152 | |
89 | Joyce Easley | Moore, TX 78057 | $1,136 |
90 | David & Glynda Baxter Family Properties Ltd | Alice, TX 78332 | $1,132 |
91 | Gwosdz Three Farms | Sandia, TX 78383 | $1,127 |
92 | Jeanene Jones | Mathis, TX 78368 | $1,120 |
93 | , | $1,097 | |
94 | Anna M Dunn | Beeville, TX 78102 | $1,065 |
95 | Crocker Harrison West Inc | George West, TX 78022 | $1,064 |
96 | Bob & Nancy Brown Partnership Ltd | George West, TX 78022 | $1,016 |
97 | Mary Carol Mcdonald | Mathis, TX 78368 | $1,015 |
98 | Alfred L Kay | San Antonio, TX 78217 | $1,011 |
99 | Robert W Swierc Jr | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $1,005 |
100 | Luke Booky Goebel | Oakville, TX 78060 | $981 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”