Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Martin County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 968
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Texas totaled $26,424,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Amber E Thorp | Fort Worth, TX 76131 | $20,043 |
122 | Jodan Jv | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $19,921 |
123 | Charles T Anderson | Austin, TX 78703 | $19,561 |
124 | Jody Louder | Midland, TX 79707 | $19,463 |
125 | Stewart Hay Farms Inc | Stanton, TX 79782 | $19,313 |
126 | Danny M Howard | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $19,013 |
127 | Michael D Payne | Stanton, TX 79782 | $18,778 |
128 | Sawyer Asset Management Ltd | Midland, TX 79705 | $18,632 |
129 | Larry Dean Romine | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $18,508 |
130 | Herschel Romine | Gravette, AR 72736 | $18,508 |
131 | Justin Refugio Acevedo | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $18,337 |
132 | William Joe Coots | Midland, TX 79706 | $18,306 |
133 | Rhi Land Inc | Knott, TX 79748 | $18,013 |
134 | Judy Kay Ireton | Stanton, TX 79782 | $17,979 |
135 | Dennis Lee Ireton | Stanton, TX 79782 | $17,979 |
136 | Derwood Blagrave | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $17,749 |
137 | Lonny Ferguson Farms Inc | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $17,612 |
138 | Mcc Farms | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $17,510 |
139 | Bryan K Roberts | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $16,572 |
140 | Michael And Tonya Cozart Jv | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $16,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”