Conservation Reserve Program in Martin County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 252
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Martin County, Texas totaled $1,395,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Coy Crow | Odessa, TX 79762 | $3,300 |
122 | Rita Briseno | San Antonio, TX 78230 | $3,136 |
123 | Mary B Ornelas | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $3,136 |
124 | A L O'neal Family Tr | Lubbock, TX 79412 | $3,116 |
125 | Karl Herzog | Driftwood, TX 78619 | $2,994 |
126 | Karolyn Herzog Porter | Stanton, TX 79782 | $2,994 |
127 | J T Springer II | Lenorah, TX 79749 | $2,929 |
128 | Fred Dennis Cave | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $2,771 |
129 | James E Airhart Estate | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $2,758 |
130 | Helen Stafford | Palestine, TX 75803 | $2,747 |
131 | Walter D Smith | Odessa, TX 79762 | $2,747 |
132 | Cox/harris Investments LLC | Paonia, CO 81428 | $2,652 |
133 | Cordelia Cox Family Trust | Lubbock, TX 79408 | $2,651 |
134 | Jay Durham | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $2,580 |
135 | Carolyn Barton | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $2,580 |
136 | Beverly Zuniga | Tahoka, TX 79373 | $2,580 |
137 | Anita Durham | San Angelo, TX 76903 | $2,580 |
138 | Marilyn Stark | Floydada, TX 79235 | $2,580 |
139 | Paula Dillard | Midland, TX 79701 | $2,530 |
140 | Marvin Standefer Jr | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $2,529 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”