Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Martin County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 784
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Martin County, Texas totaled $3,303,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The State National Bank | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $203,009 |
2 | Kyle And Misty Mcmorries Jv | Tarzan, TX 79783 | $67,387 |
3 | Vance Mcmorries | Tarzan, TX 79783 | $62,270 |
4 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $54,783 |
5 | Diamond M Farms Inc | Tarzan, TX 79783 | $53,480 |
6 | Wayne Cook & Sons Inc | Stanton, TX 79782 | $50,476 |
7 | Agtexas Fcs ** | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $49,911 |
8 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $46,200 |
9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $42,056 |
10 | J & K Cotton Farms | Lenorah, TX 79749 | $41,494 |
11 | Quaid Farms | Stanton, TX 79782 | $40,672 |
12 | K&s Cook Jv | Stanton, TX 79782 | $40,643 |
13 | Kalin Farms Inc | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $38,701 |
14 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $38,518 |
15 | Nathan L Cook | Midland, TX 79706 | $38,203 |
16 | Kenneth Cook | Stanton, TX 79782 | $36,697 |
17 | Danny Peugh Farms Inc | Stanton, TX 79782 | $35,370 |
18 | First State Bank Shallowater ** | Shallowater, TX 79363 | $35,067 |
19 | Graham Farms Jv | Midland, TX 79706 | $34,412 |
20 | Blocker And Peugh Farms Inc | Lenorah, TX 79749 | $33,963 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>