Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Matagorda County, Texas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 192
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Matagorda County, Texas totaled $2,326,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J L Evans Farm & Ranch Sugar Valley Ltd | Bay City, TX 77404 | $3,270 |
82 | Johnnie Lee Hahn | Bay City, TX 77414 | $3,144 |
83 | Frances Ashcraft | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $3,087 |
84 | Douglas M Johnson Dvm | Angleton, TX 77515 | $3,072 |
85 | Peggy D Johnson | Angleton, TX 77515 | $3,072 |
86 | Patrick J Or Cheryl L Hickl | Elmaton, TX 77440 | $3,053 |
87 | Larry J Luchak | El Campo, TX 77437 | $3,051 |
88 | Harry Weidemann Jr | Needville, TX 77461 | $2,976 |
89 | Jon J Woolsey | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $2,841 |
90 | Robert Lee Weathers | Bay City, TX 77414 | $2,727 |
91 | Michael John Saha Jr | Bay City, TX 77414 | $2,580 |
92 | Big Boggy Cattle Company | Bay City, TX 77414 | $2,208 |
93 | Jarrett B Vavra | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,187 |
94 | Susan A Novak | Bay City, TX 77414 | $2,130 |
95 | Alan C Fitzgerald | Lane City, TX 77453 | $2,118 |
96 | Travis Mark Luchak | Blessing, TX 77419 | $2,106 |
97 | Louis A Martino | Rosenberg, TX 77471 | $2,058 |
98 | Lindsey Thompson | Bay City, TX 77404 | $2,055 |
99 | Holly H Claybourn | Palacios, TX 77465 | $2,000 |
100 | Cole Robert Grisham | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $1,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”