Counter Cyclical Program in Matagorda County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 881
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Matagorda County, Texas totaled $23,357,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | William E Ottis | Bay City, TX 77414 | $44,314 |
122 | Paige D Eidlebach | Bay City, TX 77414 | $43,867 |
123 | R Bret Attaway | Bay City, TX 77414 | $43,622 |
124 | Randolph L Vyvial | Ganado, TX 77962 | $42,981 |
125 | Marvin Saha | El Maton, TX 77440 | $42,479 |
126 | Northern Camps Ranch Co | Markham, TX 77456 | $42,466 |
127 | Travis J Harrison | Bay City, TX 77414 | $42,375 |
128 | S & H Farms Inc | Bay City, TX 77404 | $41,990 |
129 | Stanley Rice Farms Inc | Bay City, TX 77404 | $41,990 |
130 | James Louis Henkes Jr | Wadsworth, TX 77483 | $41,899 |
131 | Slough Ranch Farms No 1 Inc | Collegeport, TX 77428 | $41,747 |
132 | C C Normann-petersen | Bay City, TX 77404 | $41,743 |
133 | Janet Saha | Palacios, TX 77465 | $41,139 |
134 | Michael Saha | Palacios, TX 77465 | $41,139 |
135 | E & W No 1 Farms Ltd | Bay City, TX 77404 | $41,114 |
136 | Alfred & Julia Kopecky Fam Ptn | Sugar Land, TX 77479 | $40,936 |
137 | Stephen P Harrison | Bay City, TX 77414 | $40,911 |
138 | Greg Saha | Palacios, TX 77465 | $40,451 |
139 | Ida Mae Franzen | Collegeport, TX 77428 | $40,414 |
140 | Paul Sliva | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $40,375 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”