Production Flexibility Program in Matagorda County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 994
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Matagorda County, Texas totaled $62,027,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Popek & Son | Bay City, TX 77404 | $455,659 |
22 | J & J Farms | Bay City, TX 77414 | $433,374 |
23 | Edward Leon Hlavinka Dba 3-h Farm | Bay City, TX 77414 | $427,843 |
24 | Bain Farms | Louise, TX 77455 | $403,288 |
25 | Capak Brothers Partnership | Palacios, TX 77465 | $388,758 |
26 | Spt Partners | Palacios, TX 77465 | $336,864 |
27 | Batchelder Farms | Palacios, TX 77465 | $317,490 |
28 | Bill & Freida Golden Jv | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $304,326 |
29 | Robert W & Brenda L Ackerman Jr J | Blessing, TX 77419 | $297,371 |
30 | Larry Wayne Simnacher | Bay City, TX 77404 | $289,741 |
31 | Leona Simnacher | Bay City, TX 77404 | $289,360 |
32 | Vince Popek Farms | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $287,244 |
33 | Kenneth Mckissick Jr | Markham, TX 77456 | $280,221 |
34 | Kenneth Mckissick | Markham, TX 77456 | $280,216 |
35 | David Popek | Bay City, TX 77414 | $280,009 |
36 | Ralph E Petersen Farms Inc | Blessing, TX 77419 | $278,759 |
37 | William F Green III | Bay City, TX 77404 | $275,527 |
38 | E Cross Cattle Company Inc | Wadsworth, TX 77483 | $273,769 |
39 | Kevin Mckissick | Bay City, TX 77414 | $269,925 |
40 | Wesley E Franzen | Collegeport, TX 77428 | $268,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”