Production Flexibility Program in Matagorda County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 994
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Matagorda County, Texas totaled $62,027,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Laslie & Smith Farms Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $267,494 |
42 | J T Frick | Markham, TX 77456 | $265,404 |
43 | Runnells Pasture Co Ltd Dba Run P | Bay City, TX 77414 | $264,556 |
44 | P & P Farms Ltd | Palacios, TX 77465 | $264,260 |
45 | L Herff Cornelius Jr | Wadsworth, TX 77483 | $262,962 |
46 | Glenn Vacek | Blessing, TX 77419 | $255,179 |
47 | Harry G Burkhart III | Bay City, TX 77404 | $252,469 |
48 | Michael Saha | Palacios, TX 77465 | $248,455 |
49 | Janet Saha | Palacios, TX 77465 | $248,447 |
50 | J C Stanley | Bay City, TX 77414 | $247,162 |
51 | Daniel R Henkes | Wadsworth, TX 77483 | $247,086 |
52 | Marvin Saha | El Maton, TX 77440 | $244,625 |
53 | C C Normann-petersen | Bay City, TX 77404 | $243,150 |
54 | Priscilla Cobb Wissink | Bay City, TX 77404 | $243,150 |
55 | S & H Farms Inc | Bay City, TX 77404 | $242,972 |
56 | Stanley Rice Farms Inc | Bay City, TX 77404 | $242,972 |
57 | Daniel W Shindler | Bay City, TX 77404 | $242,340 |
58 | Julius Ledwig Sr | Bay City, TX 77414 | $239,946 |
59 | O B Stanley | Bay City, TX 77404 | $238,687 |
60 | Paul Sliva | Van Vleck, TX 77482 | $237,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”